🔗 Share this article

Per a fresh analysis, scores of personnel with backgrounds in the fossil fuel sector have been positioned within the existing government, featuring over 40 who previously served straight for gas firms.

Overview of the Analysis

This study analyzed the histories of candidates and appointees serving in the executive branch and eight federal offices responsible for energy policy. These encompass important entities such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, and the Energy Department.

Wider Administrative Climate

This report comes while ongoing actions to weaken environmental rules and renewable energy incentives. As an example, latest acts have opened vast regions of public property for drilling and reduced funding for clean power.

Amid the barrage of terrible developments that have transpired on the climate front... it’s crucial to educate the citizens that these aren’t just measures from the amorphous, ginormous thing that is the leadership writ large, commented a researcher engaged in the report. They are frequently individual actors with ties to certain wealthy sectors that are carrying out this damaging pro-industry agenda.

Major Findings

Researchers found 111 staff whom they classified as energy sector veterans and renewable energy opponents. That includes 43 individuals who were previously serving by coal enterprises. Among them are prominent top leaders like the top energy official, who formerly acted as CEO of a hydraulic fracturing company.

This group additionally features lower-profile White House staff. As an illustration, the office overseeing energy efficiency is headed by a previous fracking manager. Similarly, a high-level regulatory advisor in the White House has held high-ranking jobs at prominent oil corporations.

Other Connections

An additional 12 appointees possess ties to energy-financed conservative thinktanks. These encompass former staff and fellows of organizations that have strongly resisted renewable energy and promoted the continuation of conventional sources.

Additionally 29 additional appointees are former business managers from heavy industry sectors whose operations are intimately tied to energy resources. Further officials have relationships with energy providers that market conventional power or public representatives who have supported pro-coal policies.

Departmental Focus

Investigators discovered that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior alone have connections to extractive sectors, rendering it the most heavily compromised national body. This includes the leader of the department, who has repeatedly received industry support and served as a bridge between oil and gas sector supporters and the campaign.

Campaign Funding

Fossil fuel donors provided sizable funds to the election initiative and ceremony. Since entering the White House, the leadership has not only established industry-friendly rules but also designed incentives and tariff carveouts that favor the field.

Qualifications Issues

Besides oil-tied appointees, the authors found multiple government leaders who were appointed to powerful positions with scant or no subject matter experience.

Those people may not be connected to the energy sector so explicitly, but their inexperience is problematic, said a analyst. It is reasonable to think they will be easily influenced, or easy marks, for the oil industry’s agenda.

For example, the candidate to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s office of legal affairs has minimal litigation history, having not once handled a case to resolution, nor conducted a sworn statement, and not argued a court petition.

In a separate instance, a White House advisor dealing on regulatory issues came to the position after being employed in roles disconnected to energy, with no clear direct energy industry or policy background.

White House Response

One spokesperson for the administration criticized the report, commenting that the administration’s officials are highly qualified to implement on the public’s instruction to expand national resource production.

Historical and Current Backdrop

This government enacted a substantial number of pro-industry measures during its previous term. During its present tenure, prepared with pro-business plans, it has spearheaded a considerably more extensive and stricter dismantling on environmental regulations and alternative sources.

There’s no shame, stated one researcher. They are eager and willing to go out there and promote the fact that they are performing benefits for the fossil fuel sector, resource sector, the mining sector.